Survey on health literacy and related factors among firefighters of emergency management departments in Southwest China (2024)

Study population and sampling design

In this study, 1,742 emergency rescue firefighters were selected from the firefighters of emergency rescue departments in Southwest China from February to April 2023, based on a cross-sectional research design and convenience sampling method. The survey included active fire fighters and commanders, with no age or gender restrictions. New trainees less than three months old were excluded, as well as those who were unwilling to participate in this survey. Referring to the literature method [11], the estimated health literacy level was taken as 30%, and the permissible error δ for the subjects of this study was taken as 2.50%, α = 0.05, and µ_е/2 = 1.96. According to the formula (1–1), the required sample size was 1290. the effective sample size of this study was 1742 firefighters.

Questionnaire and measure of health literacy

Two instruments used in the study were the “Demographic Information Survey”, which focuses on demographic characteristics, including sex, age, ethnicity, marital status, education level, type of work, age at work, smoking and alcohol consumption, and the In this study, we referred to the health literacy scoring standards for Chinese residents published by the China Health Education Centre [2], and used the Chinese Citizen Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) (2019 edition), which developed by the Chinese Ministry of Health, had strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s a = 0.95) and folded-half reliability (Spearman- Brown correlation coefficient of 0.94) [11]. These questions identified three dimensions of health literacy: knowledge and attitudes (KAA); knowledge and attitudes toward health-related behavior and lifestyle (BAL); health-related skills (HRS); scientific views of health (SVH); infectious diseases (ID); chronic diseases (CD); safety and first aid (SAFA); medical care (MC); and health information (HI). The questionnaire was scored out of 66 points and consisted of 50 questions including judgement, single choice, multiple choice, and situational questions. Judgement questions and single choice questions will be awarded 1 mark for correct answers and no marks for mistakes; multiple choice questions will be awarded 2 marks for correct answers to all options.2 points for correct answer of all options, no points for multiple choice, omission, wrong choice. A score of 80% or more of the total score (53 and above) was considered to be health literate. and the ratio of the number of health literate people to the total number of people in the study was considered to be the overall health literacy level of the research population. Similarly, for different dimensions or aspects of literacy, a score of 80 per cent or more of the total score was considered as having health literacy in that dimension, and the ratio of the number of people having each dimension to the total number of corresponding study participants represented the level of health literacy in that dimension [2, 11, 12].

Quality control

The design stage of the survey programme was conducted through the review and analysis of health literacy-related literature and the actual situation of the selected survey site, which in turn determined the purpose, content, methodology and specific implementation of the survey study. Strict pre-training was given to the investigators to unify the survey standards and methods, and the investigators explained the purpose of the survey to the respondents face-to-face in detail, so as to allay their concerns as much as possible, and to improve the degree of co-operation and the quality of questionnaire responses. After obtaining the informed consent of the respondents, the respondents were asked to answer the questionnaires in the form of centralised assessment on formal occasions and at formal times, so as to avoid any error bias due to personal negative attitudes or subjective desires. A uniform questionnaire was used, in an anonymous format, to ensure the authenticity and reliability of the questionnaire. Two data analysts collated, classified and screened the questionnaires and analysed the results.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using Stata MP version 17.0. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the distribution of HL in three dimensions and six aspects and expressed as the mean ± SD. The chi-square test, linear trend chi-square test, Fisher test, and rank-sum test were used to compare HL levels among sociodemographic characteristics, health-related behaviors, and family-related factors. After examining the correlation between variables and controlling for covariates, a binary logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between HL levels, sociodemographic characteristics, and health factors. At the same time. Statistical significance was considered for two-tailed P < 0.05.

Demographic characteristics

A total of 1822 people were surveyed, and 1742 valid responses were obtained; the response rate of the questionnaire was 95.6%. Among the survey respondents, there were more firefighters than fire commanders (92.1% vs. 7.9%). In terms of education level, 1227 (70.4%) held a college degree, bachelor’s degree or above. A large proportion of the participants (78.4%) lived in rural areas, and participants with a household income of 30,000 to 80,000 yuan ($4,254 to $11,320) per year were the largest income group (38.2%); 630 (36.2%) attended health knowledge classes monthly in their workplace (Table1).

Awareness of the three dimensions and six aspects of health literacy

The three dimensions of health literacy were 45.1% for basic knowledge and concepts, 43.5% for healthy lifestyles and behaviours, and 30.1% for health skills. The six dimensions of literacy were 66.6% for scientific health concepts, 30.7% for infectious disease prevention and control, 46.8% for chronic disease prevention and management, 79.9% for safety and first aid, 34.2% for basic medical care and 34.3% for health information literacy (Table2).

The relationship between health literacy levels and the characteristics of participants

The overall health literacy HL level of 1,742 emergency unit personnel was 34.3%. People with higher education or above showed higher HL levels than those with lower education levels. The HL level of urban firefighters is 41.6%, which is significantly higher than the 32.3% of rural firefighters(P < 0.05). Firefighters’ HL level was 33.5% lower than the 41.0% of fire commanders(P < 0.05). Firefighters with high annual household incomes had significantly higher levels of HL than groups with low yearly household incomes(P < 0.05). Those in excellent health had better HL levels than those in poor health(P < 0.05). In addition, we found higher HL levels for officers and enlisted personnel who had regular health education courses. The results of this study showed that several factors were significantly associated with HL (P < 0.05), such as age, ethnicity, education level, length of service, type of work, type of parental occupation, urban and rural household registration, annual household income, time spent using the Internet per day, frequency of searching for health knowledge and credibility of online information, smoking status, health status, and frequency of organizing health education classes. However, there were no significant differences in HL levels between sex, marital status, and alcohol consumption. (Table1).

Multiple logistic regression analysis of factors influencing health literacy

According to the multiple logistic regression analysis results, firefighters were found to have a 0.648 higher likelihood of having adequate HL than fire commanders (95% CI, 0.426–0.985). Similarly, those with a length of service of more than ten years were 0.496 times more likely to have adequate HL than those with less than two years of work service (95% CI, 0.251–0.981). In terms of annual household incomes, using people with an annual household income below RMB 30,000 as a reference, the likelihood of having adequate HL increased significantly with increasing annual household income, with ORs of 1.9, 2.083, 3.874, and 4.749, respectively. Time spent on the Internet per day was also one of the significant influencing factors of HL level, with ORs of 1–2h, 2h, 3h, and more than 4h being 0.559 (95% CI, 0.415–0.754), 0.417 (95% CI, 0.267–0.651), 0.363 (95% CI, 0.227–0.582), and 0.569 (95% CI, 0.379-0. 855), respectively. In addition, we also found that those who occasionally searched for and frequently searched for health information were 1.163 and 1.863 times more likely to have adequate HL than those who hardly searched for health information, respectively. Monthly health education in the unit was 1.603 times more likely to result in adequate HL than almost no health education (95% CI, 1.101–2.330) (Table3).

Emergency Management Department Health Literacy Levels

According to the results of China 2023 monitoring, the health literacy level of Chinese residents reached 29.70%. This paper reports on a survey of the health literacy levels of 1,742 first responders in Southwest China. The survey found that the health literacy level of this personnel was 34.3%, which was higher than the national average and exceeded the 30% level required in the Health China 2030 Plan Outline [13]. Looking at the urban and rural resident types, both urban and rural personnel were well above the national level.

Health literacy in Emergency Management: three dimensions and six types of concern

Looking at the three dimensions and six categories of questions, the current respondents compared to the national level in 2021 [14], KAA (45.1% vs. 37.66%), BAL (43.5% vs. 28.05%), HRS (30.1% vs. 24. The firefighters were above the national level in all three dimensions: SAFA (79.9% vs. 56.41%), SVH (66.6% vs. 50.01%), HI (34.3 vs. 35.93%), ID for prevention and control (30.7 vs. 27.60%), CD for prevention and control (46.8% vs. 26.67%) and MC (34.2 vs. 26.05%). only for health information were emergency responders below the national level in all six categories. This may reflect officers and servicemen living in closed training environments with limited access to health information [15].

The results found that the emergency management department firefighters’ health literacy was uneven, the ability to perform basic KAA and BAL was high, and the mastery of HRS was low, indicating that most firefighters have high health-related knowledge and healthy lifestyles but relatively insufficient mastery of health-related skills. The reason is that under the management system of the military, workers have a fairly good routine with long and intense daily training, a regular lifestyle, good habits for health-related behaviors and lifestyles and excellent knowledge and attitudes toward health [16]. However, heavy training usually leads to a lack of learning of the theory of health-related skills; perhaps the lack of attention given to it by firefighters leads to a low level of mastery of health-related skills [15].

Factors influencing health literacy

Univariate analyses showed differences in appropriate health literacy between urban and rural residents, but after adjusting for other demographic factors, this association was no longer detected. The possible reason for this is that urban residents have a higher level of education than those in rural areas, and the correlation between education level and health literacy is stronger. Similar to related reviewed research, most research found differences in health literacy between urban and rural areas, but after considering the influence of other factors, half of the studies found that rural areas themselves were not a significant influence on health literacy levels, and there were no differences between urban and rural areas after controlling for covariates. Rural areas were not the only cause of health literacy differences and were influenced by other factors [17].

The health literacy level of ethnic minorities in the study was low, and ethnic minorities other than the Han Chinese accounted for a total of 42.4% of the subjects in this study, suggesting that the firefighters’ workforce is rich in ethnic cultures, which may be due to the fact that the Southwest region of China is a place where ethnic minorities gather [18]. The health of ethnic minorities is also one of the most popular concerns of researchers [19]. China has the largest number of ethnic minorities in the world, and different ethnic groups may differ in basic skills due to the influence of their ethnic cultures, as well as their living environments, and the health literacy level of ethnic minorities is also affected by other factors. Relevant studies have concluded that low economic income, poor health, limited access to medical services, and different traditional concepts about the causes of disease and biomedicine contribute to the high proportion of ethnic minorities with low health literacy [17, 19–23].

In addition, in terms of annual household incomes, using people with an annual household income below RMB 30,000 as a reference, the likelihood of having adequate HL increased significantly with increasing annual household income because those from wealthy families usually have a rich knowledge base. They have a strong ability and opportunity to access and understand health information and to use it in their daily lives. People with high levels of education also have a higher ability to learn than those with low levels of education [24]. Education level was the most important factor influencing health literacy, with a positive linear correlation between health literacy and education level. Those with a university degree or higher have a higher level of health literacy than those with lower levels of education. In addition, household income was identified as influencing health literacy levels. Higher income leads to better health awareness, better housing and living conditions, reduced life stress, and improved diet quality [25]. Higher levels of health literacy have been reported to be associated with higher household income [26, 27], similar to our results. Health literacy awareness Health literacy rates were lower among participants with lower household incomes. Lower levels of household income. As household income increases, participants may pay more attention to self-health management and quality of life.

As with previous research, time spent using the Internet was correlated with health literacy levels, and appropriate use of the Internet to learn health-related knowledge and skills is one way to improve health literacy levels; the use of the Internet as a strategy for accessing medical information is very encouraging [28].

In terms of job type, commanders had higher health literacy than combatants (P < 0.05) because commanders all graduated from higher command colleges and received higher and more comprehensive education, a result that once again reflects the importance of the level of education, which is not high and comprehensive, resulting in lower levels of health literacy. Health education should consider personnel’s different levels of literacy and adopt different strategies for other groups. As in previous research, educational attainment is an important influencing factor in health literacy [29].

The study also found that a lower level of health knowledge was significantly associated with a lower smoking frequency, suggesting that personal health behaviors can directly influence health knowledge levels. According to related review research, behavioral interventions, including smoking prevention, were found to be effective in influencing health literacy levels in 68% of studies, with significant improvements in health literacy after the intervention [30]; simple models of interventions, including instructional animations, 10-minute training videos, and text messages, are equally effective in improving health literacy [31–34]; health literacy interventions can not only influence line change but also learn from behavior change, and interventions designed according to behavior change principles will probably be more effective [30].

Occasional and frequent searchers of health information in this research had ORs 1.163 and 1.863 times more likely to be health literate than those who hardly searched for health information. Using Internet tools around us to retrieve health information was a contributing factor to improving health literacy levels, and similarly, in a survey of Shanghai residents, it was found that the use of traditional media and the Internet and participation in offline activities were more helpful for residents to obtain health information and improve their health literacy level [35]. Regarding how to increase residents’ attention to health information, a study from China found that posts with new, informative headlines focusing on chronic diseases, nutrition and food-borne illnesses, and infectious diseases were more popular [36]. Analyses of the results of our research showed that in the unit, monthly health education was held 1.603 times (95% CI, 1.101–2.330) more than in healthy people with almost no health education who had adequate HL. Improving the overall quality of the emergency management department requires first strengthening education.

How can the health literacy of firefighters be improved?

Health education should focus on personal health behaviors, and interventions should be implemented to improve the health awareness and skills of personnel, such as recruiting more college students, appropriately increasing the time spent on the Internet to learn health knowledge, increasing the frequency of conducting health education knowledge lectures and strengthening the focus on personal health management in training. Education should not be limited to the interior of the emergency management unit but can be outwardly joined with local hospitals, CDCs, and medical schools for long-term cooperation and regular health talks for firefighters to expand access to health knowledge as well as training health-related skills. To improve population health literacy, K. Sørensen et al. propose a framework that includes the construction of eight action areas, including a health literate workforce, a health literate organization, health literate data governance, person-centered services, a user engagement-based environment, health literate leadership, health literacy investments and financial resources, health literate-based technology and innovation, partnerships and intersectoral collaboration, to reduce the adverse effects of inadequate population health literacy levels [37]. Y. Gao et al. proposed a multichannel, multimodal, and multisectoral collaboration to build a health education model that meets actual needs to improve public health literacy, with government departments as the main focus and medical institutions and the media as the supplement [38]. The German study found that an integrated healthcare system might be helpful in the area to improve the health literacy of the region’s population [39].

Limitations

Overall, this study has some reference value in understanding the health literacy levels and influencing factors of emergency rescue force officers and soldiers and provides some insights and suggestions for strengthening the health literacy of force officers and soldiers. However, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the sample of this study was limited to some of the emergency management department workers in the southwest region, and the results may need to be more generalizable and validated in a broader sample. Second, The comparability of this study comparing this respondent’s health literacy level with the national health literacy level is low because data on education level, family income, and age group subgroups of the National Health Literacy Survey have not been found.; Third, although the questionnaire we used to measure health literacy was comprehensive, comparisons of health literacy status with those of other countries are difficult because of different reference standards for health literacy.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable (NA).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The questionnaire used in this study originates from the National Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire was developed by the Chinese National Health Commission. The questionnaire has undergone reliability and validity testing, and does not collect personal identifying information (such as name or phone number) to protect participants’ privacy. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Chengdu Medical College and was conducted with the fully informed consent of the participants.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all respondents for approval of this research.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Peijie Jiang and Quanxin Chen contributed equally to this work.

2. Rong H, Lu L, Wang L, Liu C, Zhang L, Li F, Yi D, Lei E, Zheng C, Meng Q, et al. Investigation of health literacy status and related influencing factors in military health providers of Chinese people’s liberation Army, a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):4. 10.1186/s12889-022-14958-0 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Arriaga M, Francisco R, Nogueira P, Oliveira J, Silva C, Câmara G, Sørensen K, Dietscher C, Costa A. Health Literacy in Portugal: results of the health literacy Population Survey Project 2019–2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022, 19(7). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

5. Pelikan JM, Ganahl K. Measuring Health Literacy in general populations: primary findings from the HLS-EU Consortium’s health literacy Assessment Effort. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:34–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Durán D, Retamal I, Ochoa T, Monsalves MJ. Health literacy and adherence to treatment in different districts in Chile. Health Promot Int. 2021;36(4):1000–6. 10.1093/heapro/daaa104 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Schaeffer D, Berens EM, Vogt D, Gille S, Griese L, Klinger J, Hurrelmann K. Health literacy in Germany - findings of a Representative follow-up survey. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. 2021;118(43):723–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ministry of. Emergency Management of the People’s Republic of China. 2018.

9. Sun B, Hu M, Yu S, Jiang Y, Lou B. Validation of the Compassion fatigue short scale among Chinese medical workers and firefighters: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2016;6(6):e011279. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011279 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Yu B, Yang Z, Bai S, Shan X, Lv Q, Ding H, Hou S. Construction and grouping of a Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces Provincial-Level Mobile Rescue Hospital System. Disaster Med Pub Health Prep. 2018;12(4):502–6. 10.1017/dmp.2016.110 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Li Z, Tian Y, Gong Z, Qian L. Health Literacy and Regional Heterogeneities in China: a Population-based study. Front Public Health. 2021;9:603325. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.603325 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Mei X, Zhong Q, Chen G, Huang Y, Li J. Exploring health literacy in Wuhan, China: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1417. 10.1186/s12889-020-09520-9 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Rong H, Cheng X, Garcia JM, Zhang L, Lu L, Fang J, Le M, Hu P, Dong X, Yang J, et al. Survey of health literacy level and related influencing factors in military college students in Chongqing, China: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177776. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177776 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Weld KK, Padden D, Ricciardi R, Bibb SC. Health literacy rates in a sample of active duty military personnel. Mil Med. 2009;174(11):1137–43. 10.7205/MILMED-D-02-4308 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Aljassim N, Ostini R. Health literacy in rural and urban populations: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(10):2142–54. 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Online SSS. Historical evolution of the geographical concept and scope of the south-west region. 2012.

19. Hong Y, Zhang X. Questionnaire and LGBM Model for Assessing Health Literacy levels of mongolians in China. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2027. 10.1186/s12889-022-14392-2 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Wilson MG. Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Aust J Rural Health. 2008;16(2):56–66. 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.00953.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Shahid S, Thompson SC. An overview of cancer and beliefs about the disease in indigenous people of Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009;33(2):109–18. 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00355.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Crengle S, Luke JN, Lambert M, Smylie JK, Reid S, Harré-Hindmarsh J, Kelaher M. Effect of a health literacy intervention trial on knowledge about cardiovascular disease medications among indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. BMJ open. 2018;8(1):e018569. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018569 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Liu S, Zhao H, Fu J, Kong D, Zhong Z, Hong Y, Tan J, Luo Y. Current status and influencing factors of digital health literacy among community-dwelling older adults in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):996. 10.1186/s12889-022-13378-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Shi J, Qi L, Li Y, Liu X. Investigation of Health Literacy Status in Beijing, China. Health Lit Res Pract. 2020;4(3):e174–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Li Z, Qiu Z. How does family background affect children’s educational achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China. J Chin Sociol 2018, 5(1).

26. Zou M, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Hu P, Bai R, Huang W, Lu L, Abdullah AS, Guo JJ, Sharma M, et al. The ability to obtain, appraise and understand health information among undergraduate nursing students in a medical university in Chongqing, China. Nurs open. 2018;5(3):384–92. 10.1002/nop2.161 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Liu YB, Liu L, Li YF, Chen YL. Relationship between Health Literacy, Health-related behaviors and Health Status: a Survey of Elderly Chinese. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):9714–25. 10.3390/ijerph120809714 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Hochhauser M, Brusovansky M, Sirotin M, Bronfman K. Health literacy in an Israeli elderly population. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019;8(1):61. 10.1186/s13584-019-0328-2 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Rajah R, Hassali MAA, Murugiah MK. A systematic review of the prevalence of limited health literacy in southeast Asian countries. Public Health. 2019;167:8–15. 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.09.028 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Walters R, Leslie SJ, Polson R, Cusack T, Gorely T. Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1040. 10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Calderón JL, Shaheen M, Hays RD, Fleming ES, Norris KC, Baker RS. Improving Diabetes Health Literacy by Animation. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(3):361–72. 10.1177/0145721714527518 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Tai BW, Bae YH, LaRue CE, Law AV. Putting words into action: a simple focused education improves prescription label comprehension and functional health literacy. J Am Pharmacists Association: JAPhA. 2016;56(2):145–e142143. 10.1016/j.japh.2015.12.010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Li W, Han LQ, Guo YJ, Sun J. Using WeChat official accounts to improve malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger: an intervention study. Malar J. 2016;15(1):567. 10.1186/s12936-016-1621-y [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Zhuang R, Xiang Y, Han T, Yang GA, Zhang Y. Cell phone-based health education messaging improves health literacy. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16(1):311–8. 10.4314/ahs.v16i1.41 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Gao Y, Chen C, Hui H, Chen M, Chen N, Chen H, Zeng W, Wei Y, Wang Z, Shi J. Improving Health Literacy: Analysis of the Relationship between Residents’ Usage of Information Channels and Health Literacy in Shanghai, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022, 19(10). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

36. Ma X, Lu J, Liu W. Influencing Factors on Health Information to Improve Public Health Literacy in the Official WeChat Account of Guangzhou CDC. Front Public Health. 2021;9:657082. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.657082 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Sørensen K, Levin-Zamir D, Duong TV, Okan O, Brasil VV, Nutbeam D. Building health literacy system capacity: a framework for health literate systems. Health Promot Int. 2021;36(Supplement1):i13–23. 10.1093/heapro/daab153 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Gao Y, Zhu L, Mao ZJ. Correction: how to improve public health literacy based on polycentric public goods theory: preferences of the Chinese general population. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1222. 10.1186/s12889-022-13417-0 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Ehmann AT, Groene O, Rieger MA, Siegel A. The relationship between Health Literacy, quality of life, and Subjective Health: results of a cross-sectional study in a Rural Region in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020, 17(5). [PMC free article] [PubMed]